?

Log in

No account? Create an account
A Mother's Son? - Dragon's Dreams [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Wizard of Changes -- ©cdozo 2004 to 2015

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

A Mother's Son? [Jul. 15th, 2009|09:34 pm]
Wizard of Changes -- ©cdozo 2004 to 2015
This guy's mom must be so humiliated. This "man" has shamed his whole family. I hope he gets arrested soon and sent to prison.


 



linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: e_moon60
2009-07-16 03:52 am (UTC)
How about the grinning little snot who's watching him do it?

Another reason not to wear skirts.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ndozo
2009-07-16 05:23 am (UTC)

I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I see a market for a new line of lingerie.

But never mind those icky boys, she has weird feet. And too bad her boyfriend's arm are so measly and atrophied-looking. If he had muscles, that douche with the camera probably wouldn't be so bold.

Who are those people.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: e_moon60
2009-07-16 11:51 am (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I see a market for rear-view mirrors/cameras that catch the upskirter starting to bend down so she can kick him in the nose and also break his camera phone. And is that guy beside her a boyfriend? He looks like another stalker.

Have to admit I don't get the whole thing about guys and underwear and "upskirting." Guys' underwear (on or off them) does nothing for me. Guys whose outerwear lets their underwear show do nothing for me. I wouldn't think much of myself if my biggest thrill was taking clandestine pictures of with a rip in the crotch of their trousers.



(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ndozo
2009-07-16 12:31 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I'm laughing at the idea of that photo with us being the ones trying to take a picture of some guy's underpants. It's so ridiculous. Poor repressed, dick-driven, unevolved men. I can't imagine what it would be like to get such a big thrill out of seeing someone's undies.

What would be the most disturbing thing to print on the underwear he's trying to photographs. A picture of George Hamilton? Green labia? A happy face? A mirror? Male genitalia? A butt? A cop? Michael Jordan? Or just the words "There are 3,300,000,000 more in the world. And they all hate you."
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: e_moon60
2009-07-16 01:39 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I don't want to print anything on the underwear...I want to print something on his face. Permanent ink, across his face on the forehead and then across the cheeks & nose: UPSKIRTER.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cdozo
2009-07-16 02:29 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

The Scarlet U.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: delkytlar
2009-07-16 03:13 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

The goal for those sort of guys isn't a photo of underwear. It's the hope that there isn't any underwear. The girl looks like Paris Hilton, and, from the skirt she's wearing, I'm sure the guys behind her have a pretty good idea whether there is or isn't underwear present. Their ultimate goal is to have "the" picture that gets virally spread (pun intended) all across the Internet.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: e_moon60
2009-07-16 03:31 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

Yeah, but...that means there are people on the internet who want to see it. And there's where I run into "Why?" Why the urge to photograph, or look at, someone's underside, with or without underwear? Why the special thrill of doing it without the person knowing (supposedly) that drives guys to do it in stores (where some of them have been caught photographing every female in a skirt)?

It's not just curiosity--there are enough pictures of male and female external genitalia readily available that no one need suffer from curiosity about the structures. It's something else, which strikes me as pure D meanness.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: delkytlar
2009-07-16 05:15 pm (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I don't pretend to understand the need for this sort of thing myself. I expect that it stems from "forbidden fruit". The act of taking the photos is puerile and juvenile, but does seem to have that sense of danger -- risking getting caught, beat up, etc. You, I and others here are not among the proper demographic to comprehend what's going on in the minds of the perpetrators.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ndozo
2009-07-17 05:21 am (UTC)

Re: I bet the shot turned out badly anyway.

I think it's a fetish that has become celebrated and popularized by the braying asses on trash tv and radio. Fortunately, that's probably the closest he'll ever get to a real woman.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: curculio
2009-07-17 08:05 pm (UTC)

I agree with e_moon60

The first thing that caught my eye was the boy with the grin.

This is a very weird photo. I'm bothered by it on so many levels. What is it, a singer being followed by her pizzarazzis?
(Reply) (Thread)