||[Sep. 1st, 2008|03:40 pm]
Wizard of Changes -- ©cdozo 2004 to 2015
|[||The river is
I'm frustrated by the attention being given to Sarah Palin's daughter.
As long as she is kind to them, Ms. Palin should be allowed to support her children however she sees fit. Whether the child with Down syndrome is her's or her daughter's is nobody's business but her family's. The fact that her daughter is pregnant is also nobody's business but family.
My mom was undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancer when I called to tell her that I was pregnant and going to be a single mother. I apologized for causing her stress during an already stressful time. She replied firmly, "You never have to apologize for a grandchild of mine." That statement meant more to me than anyone can ever imagine.
Regardless of her politics, it sounds like Sarah Palin is being supportive of her daughter and her grandchild (grandchildren?). I respect her for that and wish people would stick to the issues and leave her family out of it.
2008-09-10 02:07 am (UTC)
Re: O THAT rumor!
Many airlines won't take a pregnant passenger in her last month or so, or won't take her without a doctor's OK. But Alaska Air has no such policy; it's entirely up to the passenger.
I have mixed feelings about it. One the one hand, I question the judgment of someone who would fly in labor. I was doula at my goddaughter's delivery, and although no difficulties were foreseen, the midwife went over with me what we would do if various things happened. This seems like basic caution, and putting yourself in a box with crowded seats and no medical facilities seems more than a little reckless.
On the other hand, I've always admired the pluck and stamina of those (stereotypically natives, farm workers, and the Amish) who can work up to delivery time, deliver, then return to work with her newborn in a sling. It certainly fits the rugged individualist legend.
But on balance, I'd rather have a commander-in-chief with judgment than one who is bullheadedly/heroically stoic.